![]() We also think the layout and the interface at Brownstoner is done right. Much to the relief of listing agents across the city, the names of the listing’s rightful owners are prominently displayed with a large contact button. However, this site has a lot of promise to make it to the top of our list should they change their advertising practices.Īs of this writing, Brownstoner doesn’t attempt to re-direct listing inquiries to random agents who pay to play. As a result, it would be irresponsible for us to recommend this site as one of the best home sale sites in NYC. As a result, we think the website suffers from a critical fault because inquiries are not routed to the listing agent, but rather to a random agent who has paid to advertise on the listing. That’s because these guys operate a similar advertising system to StreetEasy’s “Premier Agent” where buyer inquiries are intercepted and re-directed to random agents who have paid to advertise. ![]() ![]() ![]() It may also be a great place to start if you’re looking to meet a buyer’s agent. This website is a great place to start your search since it takes a feed from REBNY and as a result has a comprehensive listing inventory. You can also search for building amenities unique to the NYC market such as doorman, elevator, laundry room, outdoor space, parking / garage and pets allowed. For example, you can search for property types unique to NYC such as condos, co-ops, townhomes or condops. The website now offers specialized search filters for New York City, which appear only if you search for properties in the city. is a very popular search website nationwide which has recently targeted the NYC market. As a result of this dramatic shift, The New York Times has become quite popular once again, and its popularity as one of the best home sale sites in NYC is now undisputed. In October of 2017, The New York Times started accepting the REBNY RLS data feed which meant that it automatically started showing all member brokers’ listings, without charging them for it of course. However, all of this changed in late 2017 when The New York Times decided to stop charging brokers to list on its site and go along with industry standards. Many brokers decided that it simply wasn’t necessary to list on the New York Times when they already had ample exposure elsewhere. However, the hallowed newspaper lost a lot of market share to new entrants like StreetEasy, Brownstoner and other popular sites which never charged brokers to list properties. Brokers with lots of volume could purchase bulk rate plans starting at $1,000 a month. From our recollection, the NY Times wanted $140 for a two week listing, and more if you also wanted a snippet in the classified section of their physical newspaper. In fact, the NY Times used to get away with charging hundreds of dollars per listing, if purchased individually. Before the advent of StreetEasy, The New York Times had virtually a monopoly on real estate advertising in NYC. The New York Times is also a very popular newspaper, and as a result sellers can also list in the classified section of the physical newspaper in addition to its website. Unlike other sites, The New York Times will send your message to the listing agent when you inquire on a listing vs re-routing your inquiry to a random agent who paid the website money to intercept leads. We recommend using The New York Times to begin your search because this website currently doesn’t intercept and intermediate buyer inquiries. The interface is easy to use, and you can also filter for unique features like a property being sold For Sale By Owner. The New York Times offers a comprehensive selection of listings for sale in NYC on its website.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |